6850 stories
·
167 followers

Solar Power, Logically

1 Comment

We’ve all seen the ads. Some offer “free” solar panels. Others promise nearly free energy if you just purchase a solar — well, solar system doesn’t sound right — maybe… solar energy setup. Many of these plans are dubious at best. You pay for someone to mount solar panels on your house and then pay them for the electricity they generate at — presumably — a lower cost than your usual source of electricity. But what about just doing your own set up? Is it worth it? We can’t answer that, but [Brian Potter] can help you answer it for yourself.

In a recent post, he talks about the rise of solar power and how it is becoming a large part of the power generation landscape. Interestingly, he presents graphs of things like the cost per watt of solar panels adjusted for 2023 dollars. In 1975, a watt cost over $100. These days it is about $0.30. So the price isn’t what slows solar adoption.

The biggest problem is the intermittent nature of solar. But how bad is that really? It depends. If you can sell power back to the grid when you have it to spare and then buy it back later, that might make sense. But it is more effective to store what you make for your own use.

That, however, complicates things. If you really want to go off the grid, you need enough capacity to address your peak demand and enough storage to meet demand over several days to account for overcast days, for example.

There’s more to it than just that. Read the post for more details. But even if you don’t want solar, if you enjoy seeing data-driven analysis, there is plenty to like here.

Building an effective solar power system is within reach of nearly anyone these days. Some of the problems with solar go away when you put the cells in orbit. Of course, that always raises new problems.

Read the whole story
jepler
4 days ago
reply
30 cents a watt? Why, some folks pay that per kWh. Solar almost can't NOT pay for itself at that price.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
pleppik
4 days ago
Yes, but…that’s just the cost of the panels. You need inverters, mounting, installation, etc., so the actual system cost is likely to be $2-$4/watt depending on where you live. The price of the panels has dropped tremendously over the past 20 years, but the price of everything else has not.
Share this story
Delete

World’s Smallest Blinky, Now Even Smaller

1 Comment

Here at Hackaday, it’s a pretty safe bet that putting “World’s smallest” in the title of an article will instantly attract comments claiming that someone else built a far smaller version of the same thing. But that’s OK, because if there’s something smaller than this nearly microscopic LED blinky build, we definitely want to know about it.

The reason behind [Mike Roller]’s build is simple: he wanted to build something smaller than the previous smallest blinky. The 3.2-mm x 2.5-mm footprint of that effort is a tough act to follow, but technology has advanced somewhat in the last seven years, and [Mike] took advantage of that by basing his design on an ATtiny20 microcontroller in a WLCSP package and an 0201 LED, along with a current-limiting resistor and a decoupling capacitor. Powering the project is a 220-μF tantalum capacitor, which at a relatively whopping 3.2 mm x 1.6 mm determines the size of the PCB, which [Mike] insisted on using.

Assembling the project was challenging, to say the least. [Mike] originally tried a laboratory hot plate to reflow the board, but when the magnetic stirrer played havoc with the parts, he switched to a hot-air rework station with a very low airflow. Programming the microcontroller almost seemed like it was more of a challenge; when the pogo pins he was planning to use proved too large for the job he tacked leads made from 38-gauge magnet wire to the board with the aid of a micro hot air tool.

After building version one, [Mike] realized that even smaller components were available, so there’s now a 2.4 mm x 1.5 mm version using an 01005 LED. We suspect there’ll be a version 3.0 soon, though — he mentions that the new TI ultra-small microcontrollers weren’t available yet when he pulled this off, and no doubt he’ll want to take a stab at this again.

Read the whole story
jepler
4 days ago
reply
comments on hackaday came to the same conclusion as me: what if you dead-bug the LED on the IC pads and dispense with the PCB altogether...
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

ESDI Adventures (os2museum.com)

1 Comment
Comments
Read the whole story
jepler
4 days ago
reply
Remember ESDI? I had plumb fergot.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

Gmail Rolls Out AI-Powered Search

1 Comment
Google is introducing an AI-powered update to Gmail search that prioritizes "most relevant" results based on recency, frequent contacts, and most-clicked emails. The feature aims to help users more efficiently locate specific messages in crowded inboxes. The update is rolling out globally to personal Google accounts, with business accounts to follow at an unspecified date. Users will have the option to toggle between the new AI-powered "most relevant" search and the traditional reverse chronological "most recent" view.
Read the whole story
jepler
5 days ago
reply
man remember when search would find you what you searched for ???
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

Max just wiped its classic Looney Tunes lineup

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Warner Bros. Discovery has removed the entire lineup of classic Looney Tunes shorts (1930-1969) from its streaming service, Max. The company confirmed the move to Deadline, saying the streamer will prioritize adult and family programming, rather than content for kids.

This comes after Warner Bros. Discovery yanked hundreds of Looney Tunes episodes at the end of 2022, and later erroneously included the series in its list of titles leaving the platform. At the time, the company said Looney Tunes “will continue streaming on Max.” Newer Looney Tunes content, like Looney Tunes Cartoons released in 2020 and 2015’s New Looney Tunes, remains on Max.

Max didn’t immediately respond to The Verge’s request for comment.

Tons of content has been on the chopping block following David Zaslav’s takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. Along with Looney Tunes, Warner Bros. Discovery ended its deal to stream Sesame Street on Max last year, and also replaced Cartoon Network’s website with a link to sign up for its streaming service. Warner Bros. Discovery also canned its Coyote vs. Acme film starring John Cena.

Despite this, the nearly-canceled Looney Tunes spinoff The Day the Earth Blew Up made its way to theaters over the weekend thanks to Ketchup Entertainment buying the distribution rights from Warner Bros. Discovery.

Read the whole story
jepler
8 days ago
reply
~~steal~~ torrent the cultural artifacts you care about
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
fxer
7 days ago
I can’t believe you’d steal the third serving of caviar right out of Zaslav’s mouth like that
Share this story
Delete

Google's AI 'Co-Scientist' Solved a 10-Year Superbug Problem in Two Days

1 Comment
Google collaborated with Imperial College London and its "Fleming Initiative" partnership with Imperial NHS, giving their scientists "access to a powerful new AI designed" built with Gemini 2.0 "to make research faster and more efficient," according to an announcement from the school. And the results were surprising...

"José Penadés and his colleagues at Imperial College London spent 10 years figuring out how some superbugs gain resistance to antibiotics," writes LiveScience. "But when the team gave Google's 'co-scientist'' — an AI tool designed to collaborate with researchers — this question in a short prompt, the AI's response produced the same answer as their then-unpublished findings in just two days." Astonished, Penadés emailed Google to check if they had access to his research. The company responded that it didn't. The researchers published their findings [about working with Google's AI] Feb. 19 on the preprint server bioRxiv...

"What our findings show is that AI has the potential to synthesise all the available evidence and direct us to the most important questions and experimental designs," co-author Tiago Dias da Costa, a lecturer in bacterial pathogenesis at Imperial College London, said in a statement. "If the system works as well as we hope it could, this could be game-changing; ruling out 'dead ends' and effectively enabling us to progress at an extraordinary pace...."

After two days, the AI returned suggestions, one being what they knew to be the correct answer. "This effectively meant that the algorithm was able to look at the available evidence, analyse the possibilities, ask questions, design experiments and propose the very same hypothesis that we arrived at through years of painstaking scientific research, but in a fraction of the time," Penadés, a professor of microbiology at Imperial College London, said in the statement. The researchers noted that using the AI from the start wouldn't have removed the need to conduct experiments but that it would have helped them come up with the hypothesis much sooner, thus saving them years of work.

Despite these promising findings and others, the use of AI in science remains controversial. A growing body of AI-assisted research, for example, has been shown to be irreproducible or even outright fraudulent.

Google has also published the first test results of its AI 'co-scientist' system, according to Imperial's announcement, which adds that academics from a handful of top-universities "asked a question to help them make progress in their field of biomedical research... Google's AI co-scientist system does not aim to completely automate the scientific process with AI. Instead, it is purpose-built for collaboration to help experts who can converse with the tool in simple natural language, and provide feedback in a variety of ways, including directly supplying their own hypotheses to be tested experimentally by the scientists."

Google describes their system as "intended to uncover new, original knowledge and to formulate demonstrably novel research hypotheses and proposals, building upon prior evidence and tailored to specific research objectives...

"We look forward to responsible exploration of the potential of the AI co-scientist as an assistive tool for scientists," Google adds, saying the project "illustrates how collaborative and human-centred AI systems might be able to augment human ingenuity and accelerate scientific discovery.
Read the whole story
jepler
8 days ago
reply
It's far more likely that google's official answer about what was in the training set was incorrect. I mean, what were they going to do, read through it and check??
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories