6867 stories
·
166 followers

NEW PRODUCT: Adafruit Triple Matrix Bonnet for Raspberry Pi

1 Comment

NEW PRODUCT: Adafruit Triple Matrix Bonnet for Raspberry Pi
_____________________________________________________________

You can now create large, dazzling LED matrix displays with your Raspberry Pi with the Adafruit Triple Matrix Bonnet for Raspberry Pi. This boards plugs into your Raspberry Pi with 2×20 header, and makes it super easy to control three parallel strings of HUB75 RGB matrices such as those we stock in the shop and create colorful scrolling displays or mini LED walls with ease.

Unlike our single-panel Matrix Bonnet, this board can drive 3 panels in parallel, also known as “active3” pinout. This means it can handle approximately 3x as many panels/pixels. However, as a trade-off, the power management is not done on-board. Instead you will have to provide the 5V 10A+ power separately! We recommend two power distribution bus barsthey’re good for many amps and make wiring easier.

  • “Bonnet” boards work on Raspberry Pi with a 40-pin GPIO header — Zero, Zero W/WH, Model A+, B+, Pi 2, Pi 3, Pi 4, Pi 5 They do not work with older 26-pin boards like the original Model A or B. Note with the Pi Zero, you may need to solder a header on the Pi board; it’s normally unpopulated on that model. For best performance we recommend a Pi 4 or Pi 5.
  • For Pi 0, 2, 3, and 4 we recommend the rpi-rgb-matrix driver, with C and Python bindings. It works great, just select the standard/active3 pinout.
  • For Pi 5+, we recommend using our PIO-based matrix driver which supports up to 3 panels – check the guide for the demo code for the triple bonnet
  • By default the bonnet has a slim 2×20 header on it. If you need to ‘lift’ the bonnet above an enclosure, pick up a 2×20 riser header.
  • If you want to get access to GPIO while the bonnet is installed, pick up a 2×20 stacking header – the pins will slide through the socket and you can plug something else on top.

This bonnet will make your mega-matrix projects super easy and avoid wiring complexity and mistakes:

  • Simple design – plug in IDC cables, provide separate power to each panel, run our Python code!
  • Onboard level shifters to convert the RasPi’s 3.3V to 5.0V logic for clean and glitch free matrix driving
  • Fully assembled compact design no soldering required! Plugs onto any Raspberry Pi with a 2×20 connector, and you’re ready to glow.

Works with any of our 16×32, 32×32, 32×64, or 64×64 RGB LED Matrices with HUB75 connections. When using with 64×64 you can select whether the Address E pin is on the 4’th or 8’th IDC pad with an on-board switch. Want even more lights? No problem, chain multiple matrices together for a longer display. The bigger the display the harder it is on the Pi, so keep that in mind if you’re using a lower-powered Pi Zero.

Please note: this Bonnet is only for use with HUB75 type RGB matrices. Not for use with NeoPixel, DotStar, or other ‘addressable’ LEDs.

Each order comes with a fully assembled and ready to go bonnet with all parts assembled. RGB Matrix is not included, please check out our fine selection

A serious 5V power supply is also required, not included, for power the matrix itself; the Pi cannot do it, to calculate the power, multiply the width of all the chained matrices * 0.12 Amps : A 32 pixel wide matrix can end up drawing 32*0.12 = 3.85A per panel so we recommend a 5V 10A power supply. Actual power usage will vary with how many LEDs you light up at once.

Raspberry Pi not included (but we have ’em in the shop so pick one up! Pi 5 is recommended as its the newest, but Pi 4 will also work well)

Read the whole story
jepler
9 hours ago
reply
yay! I did the software for this one back in March or so, glad to see it hitting the store.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

DuPont Wire Organizer – minimalist + small footprint #3DThursday #3DPrinting

1 Comment

Shared by greenribbit on Thingiverse:

I wanted a way to keep my DuPont wires together and organized but wasn’t a big fan of the big clunky comb-style organizers. So I made my own!

This organizer can hold about 20 to 22 wires at a time. The wires I have are about 195mm long (excluding the plastic connectors). Fully packet, the organizer has a foot print of roughly 25mm by 125 mm.

Keep in mind I print with a 0.8mm nozzle @ 0.4mm layer height. So, this model is optimized for that configuration. It should print fine if you use a different nozzle diameter and layer height, but no guarantees!

There is a slight technique to inserting the wires into the organizer. Basically, hold the organizer in one hand, and press the wire against the slot with the thumb on that hand, while using your other hand to kind of “wind” the wire around the curve. I know, I know…trust me it is easier than it sounds and it keeps your wires nice and snug!

Download the files and learn more


649-1
Every Thursday is #3dthursday here at Adafruit! The DIY 3D printing community has passion and dedication for making solid objects from digital models. Recently, we have noticed electronics projects integrated with 3D printed enclosures, brackets, and sculptures, so each Thursday we celebrate and highlight these bold pioneers!

Have you considered building a 3D project around an Arduino or other microcontroller? How about printing a bracket to mount your Raspberry Pi to the back of your HD monitor? And don’t forget the countless LED projects that are possible when you are modeling your projects in 3D!

Read the whole story
jepler
13 days ago
reply
this looks pretty clever.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

AOSP Isn't Dead, But Google Just Landed a Huge Blow To Custom ROM Developers

1 Comment
Google has removed device trees and driver binaries for Pixel phones from the Android 16 source code release, significantly complicating custom ROM development for those devices. The Android-maker intentionally omitted these resources as it shifts its Android Open Source Project reference target from Pixel hardware to a virtual device called "Cuttlefish."

The change forces custom ROM developers to reverse-engineer configurations they previously received directly from Google. Nolen Johnson from LineageOS said the process will become "painful," requiring developers to "blindly guess and reverse engineer from the prebuilt binaries what changes are needed each month." Google also squashed the Pixel kernel source code's commit history, eliminating another reference point developers used for features and security patches.

Google VP Seang Chau dismissed speculation that AOSP itself is ending, stating the project "is NOT going away." However, the changes effectively bring Pixel devices down to the same difficult development level as other Android phones.
Read the whole story
jepler
21 days ago
reply
google steadily erasing reasons to actually choose a pixel phone.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

'We Finally May Be Able to Rid the World of Mosquitoes. But Should We?'

1 Comment and 2 Shares
It's no longer a hypothetical question, writes the Washington Post. "In recent years, scientists have devised powerful genetic tools that may be able to eradicate mosquitoes and other pests once and for all."

But along with the ability to fight malaria, dengue, West Nile virus and other serious diseases, "the development of this technology also raises a profound ethical question: When, if ever, is it okay to intentionally drive a species out of existence...?" When so many wildlife conservationists are trying to save plants and animals from disappearing, the mosquito is one of the few creatures that people argue is actually worthy of extinction. Forget about tigers or bears; it's the tiny mosquito that is the deadliest animal on Earth. The human misery caused by malaria is undeniable. Nearly 600,000 people died of the disease in 2023, according to the World Health Organization, with the majority of cases in Africa... But recently, the Hastings Center for Bioethics, a research institute in New York, and Arizona State University brought together a group of bioethicists to discuss the potential pitfalls of intentionally trying to drive a species to extinction. In a policy paper published in the journal Science last month, the group concluded that "deliberate full extinction might occasionally be acceptable, but only extremely rarely..."

It's unclear how important malaria-carrying mosquitoes are to broader ecosystems. Little research has been done to figure out whether frogs or other animals that eat the insects would be able to find their meals elsewhere. Scientists are hotly debating whether a broader "insect apocalypse" is underway in many parts of the world, which may imperil other creatures that depend on them for food and pollination... Instead, the authors said, geneticists should be able to use gene editing, vaccines and other tools to target not the mosquito itself, but the single-celled Plasmodium parasite that is responsible for malaria. That invisible microorganism — which a mosquito transfers from its saliva to a person's blood when it bites — is the real culprit.

A nonprofit research consortium called Target Malaria has genetically modified mosquitoes in their labs (which get core funding from the Gates Foundation and from Open Philanthropy, backed by Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife). ), and hopes to deploy them in the wild within five years...
Read the whole story
jepler
25 days ago
reply
f--- mosquitos, even the ones that don't carry disease.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
angelchrys
25 days ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

The Bellmac-32 CPU — What?

1 Comment

If you have never heard of the Bellmac-32, you aren’t alone. But it is a good bet that most, if not all, of the CPUs in your devices today use technology pioneered by this early 32-bit CPU. The chip was honored with the IEEE Milestone award, and [Willie Jones] explains why in a recent post in Spectrum.

The chip dates from the late 1970s. AT&T’s Bell Labs had a virtual monopoly on phones in the United States, but that was changing, and the government was pressing for divestiture. However, regulators finally allowed Bell to enter the computing market. There was only one problem: everyone else had a huge head start.

There was only one thing to do. There was no point in trying to catch the leaders. Bell decided to leap ahead of the pack. In a time when 8-bit processors were the norm and there were nascent 16-bit processors, they produced a 32-bit processor that ran at a — for the time — snappy 2 MHz.

At the time (1978), most chips used PMOS or NMOS transistors, but Bellmac-32 used CMOS and was made to host compiled C programs. Problems with CMOS were often addressed using dynamic logic, but Bell used a different technique, domino logic, to meet their goals.

Domino logic lets devices cascade like falling dominoes in between clock pulses. By 1980, the device reached 2 MHz, and a second generation could reach speeds of up to 9 MHz. For contrast, the Intel 8088 from 1981 ran at 4.77 MHz and handled, at most, half the data in a given time period as the Bellmac-32. Of course, the 68000 was out a year earlier, but you could argue it was a 16-bit CPU, despite some 32-bit features.

It is fun to imagine what life would be like today if we had fast 32-bit Unix machines widely available in the early 1980s. History has shown that many of Bellmac’s decisions were correct. CMOS was the future. Many of the design and testing techniques would go on to become standard operating procedure across the industry. But, as for the Bellmac-32, it didn’t really get the attention it deserved. It did go on in the AT&T 3B computers as the WE 32×00 family of CPUs.

You can check out a 1982 promo video about the CPU below, which also explains domino logic. Instruction sets have changed a bit since then. You can see a 68000 and 8086 face off, and imagine how the Bellmac would have done in comparison.

Read the whole story
jepler
26 days ago
reply
awww making me sad I never got the 3B2 I bought at auction in around 1999 to boot.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete

Europe’s first rover to land on moon – and it’s carrying a tiny red house

1 Comment

Equipped with a tiny red house from Swedish artist Mikael Genberg, the Tenacious rover is just about the cutest rover there ever was! MSN.com reports:

Mr Genbeg has been trying to get his art to the moon for 25 years, said Dr Lamamy, “but 25 years ago, only space agencies were going to the Moon”.

“To me, that reflects what we’re here for,” he said. “Of course, we’re here to contribute to science and exploration and knowledge about the moon, but we’re also here to give access to other folks that have cool projects.”

Read more here.

Via Bruce Sterling on Mastodon

Read the whole story
jepler
27 days ago
reply
sniff .. it crashed into the moon.
Earth, Sol system, Western spiral arm
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories